THE PATTERN
Episode Transcript

Vertical video graduates from format experiment to its own genre

Monday 12 October 2026

Good morning. This is The Pattern for Monday 12 October 2026.

The lead story today is about a format becoming a genre, and why that distinction actually matters.

A startup called Vurt is making the case that vertical video, the stuff shot natively for portrait screens, is its own creative form. Not just reformatted television. Not a defensive TikTok play. A genre with its own grammar, its own pacing, its own storytelling logic. Every major streaming service has been experimenting with vertical content, but they've mostly been treating it as a channel, something to post on, not something to commission for.

Vurt is arguing that's the wrong frame entirely. And I think they're right. When podcasting separated itself from radio in people's minds, it unlocked completely different budgets, talent structures, and measurement systems. The same window is open here. The platforms that build original vertical programming before the industry standardises the metrics will own the category. That's not a small thing.

Now the signals.

First: Apple has disclosed a deal to hire the team and license the technology from a personalised podcast startup called Huxe. This is Apple's classic soft-entry move. You acquire the capability quietly, you absorb the people, and then you ship the feature inside an app half a billion people already use. Audio strategies built around static RSS feeds and fixed episode structures are working with a shorter runway than they were last Friday.

Second: Jackson Wang and Edison Chen have released a collaboration under the name CASE NO.852. That's the international dialling code for Hong Kong. They've turned a phone prefix into an archival design system, with the entire collection organised around it. It's a genuinely clever identity move. Claiming a city as heritage is something Western brands do all the time, usually badly, with some vague reference to craft or history. Turning the dialling code into a product taxonomy is specific in a way that generic heritage claims never are.

Third: JW Anderson and UNIQLO have framed their new collection around theatre and campus life rather than around the product itself. The campaign concept and the collection concept are the same thing. When that happens, editorial coverage becomes structurally free, because journalists covering both culture and fashion have a reason to write about it. The collaboration brief started with a world, and the garments are evidence of that world. Worth stealing as a process.

Fourth: Silicon Valley's most prominent voices are adopting Trump's rebranding of artificial intelligence as 'super intelligence.' I'd normally file this under political noise, but the vocabulary that industry leaders use in public filters into boardrooms and pitch decks within weeks. 'AI' and 'super intelligence' now carry different political signals depending on who's in the room and what you want them to hear. The terminology choice is no longer neutral, and whoever manages your technology messaging probably needs to know that.

Fifth: A new book is cataloguing New York's pandemic-era dining sheds, those improvised plywood and perspex structures that restaurants installed on pavements during Covid. What was scrappy and temporary is being reclassified as design history. When necessity gets archived and aestheticised, it means the culture has processed the period and is ready to mine it. Brands that built unexpected physical formats between 2020 and 2023 are sitting on a heritage asset they may not have noticed yet.

The thread connecting all of this is about naming. Not branding in the marketing sense, but the moment when something informal gets a name that sticks, because that's when it starts attracting dedicated resource. Vertical video gets a genre name, it gets its own commissioning budget. A dialling code becomes a design system, it turns geography into proof. Pandemic sheds get a book, they become a design reference. The question worth carrying into meetings this week: what format or approach in your own mix is one clean piece of naming away from becoming something people budget for properly?

That's The Pattern for today. Before it's obvious. See you tomorrow.